Blog
Success Stories
Verdict Inclinations
88% of jurors leaned toward the plaintiffs, with 69% strongly favoring them.
How a CA Police Department Avoids Nuclear Verdict
The Challenge
Our client, a municipal entity, was defending against a high-profile civil lawsuit alleging negligence and misconduct by law enforcement. The plaintiffs, three individuals, sought significant damages for emotional and physical harm, with demands totaling $55 million. The stakes were high, and the defense team needed an accurate assessment of potential exposure to make informed decisions before mediation.
How We Helped
To provide clarity, we conducted a detailed case valuation study. Using a carefully selected, demographically representative pool of jurors, we simulated 1,000 potential jury panels. The analysis revealed the following:
Accuracy
The damages projection provided a clear, reliable benchmark for settlement negotiations.
Damages Projections
The simulated average total award was $22.1 million, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from $10.5 million to $35.5 million.
Strategy
Insights into juror inclinations helped the team prioritize case themes and craft persuasive arguments for mediation.
Individual Damages Estimates
Plaintiff 1: $5.4 million
Plaintiff 2: $6.0 million
Plaintiff 3: $10.6 million
This data-driven approach highlighted juror tendencies and pinpointed key arguments that influenced their decision-making.
The Outcome
Armed with these insights, the defense team strategically approached mediation and successfully negotiated a settlement for $22 million—precisely aligned with our predicted average damages estimate. This outcome avoided the uncertainty of a trial while achieving a resolution acceptable to both parties.
Key Benefits for the Client
Efficiency
Our rapid, two-week turnaround allowed the defense to act decisively without delaying critical case milestones.
This case demonstrates the power of predictive analytics to transform litigation strategy, delivering precise results that enable informed decision-making.
Verdict Inclinations
96% of simulated juries were inclined to favor the plaintiff, with 59% strongly favoring them.
How a Savvy Plaintiff Maximizes Settlement Against Google
The Challenge
Our client, an executive plaintiff, brought a lawsuit against Google alleging wrongful termination and retaliation. The stakes were high, with significant claims for economic, non-economic, and punitive damages. The client engaged VerdictSimulator early in discovery, seeking clarity on potential jury behavior and damages valuation to strengthen their case strategy. They needed actionable insights before mediation to gain a negotiation edge.
How We Helped
To provide clarity, we conducted a detailed case valuation study. Using a carefully selected, demographically representative pool of jurors, we simulated 1,000 potential jury panels. The analysis revealed the following:
Strategic Edge
Early insights allowed the plaintiff to tailor their arguments, presenting a compelling narrative that resonated during mediation.
Damages Projections
The predicted average total damages award was $3.4 million, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from $1.5 million to $6.4 million.
Negotiation Power
Knowing the data-backed valuation of the case enabled the plaintiff to negotiate from a position of strength.
Individual Damages Estimates
Respondents highlighted the defendant's lack of transparency and perceived retaliation as key issues influencing their decisions.
This data gave the plaintiff’s team an evidence-backed understanding of their case value and the factors most likely to resonate with jurors.
The Outcome
Using the insights from our analysis, the plaintiff approached mediation with confidence, prepared to highlight the strongest elements of their case. The strategy resulted in a favorable settlement exceeding the predicted average damages amount—demonstrating the power of having early and reliable information before the opposing side.
Key Benefits for the Client
Resource Optimization
By engaging us early, the client avoided unnecessary discovery expenses, saving time and resources while maximizing their settlement.
This case highlights the value of engaging VerdictSimulator early in litigation to gain a decisive advantage and optimize outcomes.
Verdict Tendencies
Simulations indicated a strong likelihood that jurors would favor the plaintiff, with a majority awarding damages.
How International Airline Secures Favorable Settlement Using Predictive Analytics
The Challenge
Our client, a major international airline, faced an admitted liability lawsuit stemming from a significant aviation incident. The plaintiff alleged severe physical and emotional harm, seeking over $10 million in damages. With trial rapidly approaching and mediation looming, the airline needed clear, actionable insights to guide their strategy and achieve the best possible outcome.
How We Helped
To provide clarity, we conducted a comprehensive jury simulation using a large, demographically representative pool. Our analysis simulated 1,000 potential jury panels and delivered critical findings, including:
Data-Driven Confidence
The predictive analysis empowered the legal team to negotiate from a position of strength, reducing uncertainty at a critical juncture.
Damages Projections
Our analysis predicted a substantial average damages award, providing a reliable benchmark for settlement discussions.
Targeted Strategy
Juror profiling and damages estimates helped the team craft a compelling narrative and focus on their most persuasive defense arguments.
Strategic Juror Profiles
Insights into juror attitudes revealed that certain demographics and prior experiences correlated strongly with higher awards, enabling the defense to refine their narrative and focus on mitigating key juror concerns.
This tailored analysis provided the airline’s legal team with data-driven guidance as they entered final mediation.
The Outcome
Using our insights, the defense team successfully navigated mediation and achieved a settlement significantly below the predicted average damages award. By strategically addressing the most impactful juror concerns, they were able to resolve the case favorably without proceeding to trial.
Key Benefits for the Client
Ongoing Value
Satisfied with the results, the client retained VerdictSimulator for multiple additional cases, recognizing the transformative impact of predictive analytics on litigation outcomes.
This case underscores the value of VerdictSimulator in high-stakes litigation, turning complex and uncertain scenarios into manageable, strategic opportunities for success.
